Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.2%-6.5% regression in blink_perf.owp_storage at 592113:592229 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 20
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/106578c0e40000
,
Sep 24
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/106578c0e40000 Reland "Enable Perfetto by default for all telemetry tests" by oysteine@google.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/0f374eff414ec0683aafbe2aae3fd405a4fcc221 353.1 → 377.7 (+24.64) [FCP++] Largest/Last Text Paint nits by maxlg@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/e62b9095fe750f3dad440f98c5775c4f6ac4f165 376 → 376.9 (+0.8894) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Sep 24
The chart shows that the regression starts at 592127: https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/106578c0e40000 @oysteine could you take a look? My CL was just about trivial refactoring on a feature behind a flag. It should be unrelated.
,
Sep 24
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 20