Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.5% regression in blink_perf.owp_storage at 591820:591903 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Sep 19
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/111dd7c0e40000
,
Sep 20
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/111dd7c0e40000 Use exact size for mojo::DataPipes when reading smaller blobs. by wanderview@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/130518b367014dade21c360afd6bf50986fb4f79 3490 → 3656 (+166.3) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Benchmark documentation link: https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
,
Sep 20
This is another small regression in a microbenchmark. Since avoiding over-allocation of shared memory has larger system-wide benefits I'm going to mark this as WONTFIX, similar to bug 884331 . |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Sep 19