Abrt in webrtc::video_coding::RtpFrameObject::RtpFrameObject |
||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6434618168049664 Fuzzer: afl_rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer Job Type: afl_chrome_asan Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Abrt Crash Address: 0x053900002203 Crash State: webrtc::video_coding::RtpFrameObject::RtpFrameObject webrtc::FuzzOneInput webrtc_fuzzer_main.cc Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=afl_chrome_asan&range=591170:591178 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6434618168049664 Issue filed automatically. See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reference.md for more information.
,
Sep 19
Predator and CL could not provide any possible suspects. Using Code Search for the file, "rtp_frame_reference_finder_fuzzer.cc" suspecting the below Cl might have caused this issue Suspect CL: https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src.git/+/918f50c5d14040385e912a676e739e9248b03aef kwiberg@ -- Could you please check whether this is caused with respect to your change, if not please help us in assigning it to the right owner. Thanks!
,
Sep 19
My CL appears unlikely to cause this sort of problem, because it just rewrites calls to use the same functions by different names (with a regexp, so limited risk of human errors creeping in). Also, it touches over a thousand source files and doesn't appear to have caused any problems in the 2.5 months since it landed. Routing to the Video component, since it's a CHECK failure in video coding code.
,
Sep 19
,
Sep 20
Unable to provide possible suspect using Predator, CL and Code Search. Could someone please look into the issue. Thank You...
,
Sep 24
Possibly related to https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/ef615ea7a3960f13aeb341e9a76e627aff875238 ?
,
Oct 16
philipel@, just wondering did you get a chance to look into this?
,
Nov 1
Unassigning in preparation for the upcoming fuzzathon, to give others a chance to pick it up. Please feel free to reassign yourself if you still wish to own this.
,
Nov 29
ClusterFuzz testcase 6434618168049664 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
,
Dec 4
|
||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||||
Comment 1 by dtapu...@chromium.org
, Sep 18