New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 883386 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 882471
Owner:
palmer@chromium.org
Closed: Sep 12
Cc:
█ ushesh@chromium.org
palmer@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

10.2% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 589681:589742

Project Member Reported by ushesh@chromium.org, Sep 12 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 12 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=883386

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=b10afa3210a63a82248a79e22c2118cf9ab8bbdecb719c3cd526e87f2b0dba12


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf

blink_perf.bindings - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Sep 12

Cc: palmer@chromium.org
Owner: palmer@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/110b63fb640000

[PartitionAlloc] Add a flag to allow callers to zero-fill allocations. by palmer@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/7bd9d693667d585c44d2d29666860c678c19bc83
1702 → 1868 (+165.7)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks

Comment 4 by palmer@chromium.org, Sep 12

Mergedinto: 882471
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)
I'm pretty sure this is also a duplicate of  Issue 882471 , and fixed by https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1222290.
►

Sign in to add a comment