New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 883378 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.2% regression in media.desktop at 587712:587816

Project Member Reported by liber...@chromium.org, Sep 12

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=883378

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=4c0a03a8f478ca64aa46802a2af7892650c2241c877bdd15ce945729b5ee5304


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Win 7 Nvidia GPU Perf

media.desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  None
Cc: lethalantidote@chromium.org
Owner: lethalantidote@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/165dfeb5640000

Moves cc::Surfaces for Videos onto its own thread. by lethalantidote@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/79f7c91a2b2a2932cd447fa6f865cb6662fa8fa6
1.101e+07 → 1.114e+07 (+1.311e+05)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Benchmark documentation link:
  None
Cc: mlamouri@chromium.org
Based on the graphs, I'd mark it as WontFix, what do yall think?

Sign in to add a comment