New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 880314 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Jan 15
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.2%-61.6% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 586968:587006

Project Member Reported by maxlg@chromium.org, Sep 4

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=880314

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=5d79f60ef90eb4cee9283cb9a67f76ce96c744dcd0d03a32c06bfb0302914a28


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-perf
mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf

system_health.common_desktop - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/system-health-benchmarks
Cc: oysteine@chromium.org
Owner: oysteine@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1798c205640000

Revert "Reland "Enable Perfetto by default for all telemetry tests"" by oysteine@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/00bea4ec5efd575a09604b89fbf6123b14690fb6
0.04428 → 0.07216 (+0.02788)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Oh nevermind, the regression was caused by the revert and not the original CL..? That's unexpected.
Oystein, did the original change cause improvement so the reverting caused regression?
Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
Yep, and looks like the graphs all improved again with crrev.com/603931

Generally these are very low cpu_time_percentage_avg values, so changes in measurement overhead are pretty noticeable.

Sign in to add a comment