Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.4%-33500% regression in xr.browsing.wpr.static at 587227:587352 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionBisect points to https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1180574 as the culprit.
,
Aug 31
,
Sep 11
,
Sep 11
,
Sep 11
I had an offline discussion about this test with bsheedy@: "loads some archived web pages in the VR browser mostly the same pages as memory.top_10_mobile. Essentially all it does is measure the memory usage when viewing a static web page (no scrolling or anything)". This is likely at least partially a memory accounting issue but the 33500% regression looks very concerning.
,
Sep 11
Note that while some of the percentage increases are quite large, the absolute increase is only a few megabytes. Still worth looking into, but not nearly as bad as it sounds.
,
Sep 26
Dug into this - it isn't actually a real issue - basically, memory moved from the browser process to the GPU process, but overall, memory was generally the same. See: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=7b4ed61e30759d51cab3ea888ca669d57d661f82faa46d4981cfc9f1e42690fe&start_rev=583249&end_rev=593143 In some cases it's harder to see the movement, as memory moved from SharedMemory to Malloc memory (as in-process command buffer doesn't need shared mem to communicate), but the cases I looked at all seemed to be 1:1 transfers from one category to another. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 31