New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 878918 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Fixed
Owner:
Closed: Oct 1
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

28.7% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 585175:585240

Project Member Reported by bokan@chromium.org, Aug 29

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=878918

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=7169bb798564adda57e202416b8cb094c07c61d5f9aef05fe286253f5abb8dd9


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

Android Nexus6 WebView Perf

blink_perf.canvas - Benchmark documentation link:
  https://bit.ly/blink-perf-benchmarks
Owner: g...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Splitting this out from issue 877184 - bisect pointed to:

Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9f547654633778c99e48754b772b75d088f6280a
672.5 → 545.6 (-126.9)
Cc: afdo-chr...@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/109bdf13640000

Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9f547654633778c99e48754b772b75d088f6280a
668.2 → 546.1 (-122)

Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1" is a roll.

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
I'm assuming this'll go the same as  issue 877606 , but we don't appear to have data since the 24th, so :(

I'll keep an eye on the chart for new data, in any case.

Thanks!
Status: Fixed (was: Assigned)
Appears to be recovered and reasonably stable (though depending on how issue 889742 goes, we may still disable AFDO for this benchmark).

Sign in to add a comment