Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
28.7% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 585175:585240 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 29
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/109bdf13640000
,
Aug 29
Splitting this out from issue 877184 - bisect pointed to: Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9f547654633778c99e48754b772b75d088f6280a 672.5 → 545.6 (-126.9)
,
Aug 29
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/109bdf13640000 Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9f547654633778c99e48754b772b75d088f6280a 668.2 → 546.1 (-122) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 70.0.3529.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3530.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Aug 30
I'm assuming this'll go the same as issue 877606 , but we don't appear to have data since the 24th, so :( I'll keep an eye on the chart for new data, in any case. Thanks!
,
Oct 1
Appears to be recovered and reasonably stable (though depending on how issue 889742 goes, we may still disable AFDO for this benchmark). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 29