Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Two finger scroll momentum exceedingly high in 68.0.3440.106 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Reported by
jsl...@gmail.com,
Aug 28
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.79 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Update from 67.0.3396.79 to 68.0.3440.106 2. Use two finger scroll on any website 3. Page continues scrolling upon release of fingers for significantly longer than in 67.0.3396.79. What is the expected behavior? The expected behavior, as it was in 67.0.3396.79, is that the scrolling should end quickly after the release of two fingers. Also, a two finger scroll flick should be able to traverse an entire webpage from top to bottom. What went wrong? In 68.0.3440.106, the scrolling action has significantly more momentum and takes much longer to come to a halt. Additionally, the scrolling rate is substantially slower than in 67.0.3396.79. Multiple two finger scroll flicks are required to traverse the page. Did this work before? Yes 67.0.3396.79 Chrome version: 68.0.3440.106 Channel: n/a OS Version: 10.0 Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 30.0 r0 HP Elitebook 850 G3, Windows 10, 1709 (OS Build 16299.611), Synaptics Precision Touchpad, Synaptics driver version 19.0.19.65
,
Aug 28
Unable to reproduce the issue on chrome reported version# 68.0.3440.106 using Windows-10 HP ELITEBOOK with steps mentioned below: 1) Launched chrome reported version and navigated to chrome://flags page and Wikipedia 2) Scrolled the page with two fingers, Page continues scrolling upon release of fingers Observations: Tested the issue by launching the chrome version# 67.0.3396.79 and checked the scrolling behaviour and updated the chrome to version# 68.0.3440.106 and observed the behaviour of scrolling the webpage with two finger scroll, seen same behaviour on two versions @Reporter: Please find the attached screencast for your reference and let us know if we missed anything in reproducing the issue. Thanks!
,
Sep 7
Hi Viswa, Thanks for your reply. Looking at your attached video, I agree that there is no difference in scrolling behavior between v68.0.3440.106 and v67.0.3396.79 on your system. It seems that the behavior in both v68 and v67 on your system is the 'high scroll momentum' behavior I refer to in the first post. On my system, I am still experiencing the same difference in behavior between the two versions. On v67, the scroll momentum is much lower and flicking allows me to traverse an entire webpage from top to bottom. The scrolling behavior is similar as to when I scroll in other programs, such as Windows explorer, etc. On the other hand, in v68 there is very high scroll momentum and flicking does not traverse very far down the webpage. I would like to retain the behavior that I experience in v67 (and all earlier versions) with the lower scroll momentum and high scroll speed. I was wondering how I may diagnose the difference in scrolling behavior between v67 and v68 and how I can implement the behavior desired behavior in v68. Thanks very much!
,
Sep 7
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Sep 10
Unable to reproduce this issue on latest chrome 69.0.3497.81 Using Windows 10. Steps: --------- 1) Launched chrome reported version 2) Navigated to Wikipedia and Scrolled the page with two fingers As we have observed that scrolling behaves normally @Reporter: Could you please upgrade to latest chrome stable 69.0.3497.81, you can download latest chrome builds here:" https://www.chromium.org/getting-involved/dev-channel ". Let us know whether issue still persists. Also retry the issue by creating New Profile with out having apps and extensions. Thanks.!
,
Nov 15
**UI mass Triage** Closing the issue, if you feel this issue should still be addressed, feel free to reopen it or to file a new issue. Thanks! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by vamshi.kommuri@chromium.org
, Aug 28