Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
VoiceOver no longer speaks ARIA alerts in Chrome 69 beta
Reported by
st...@desmos.com,
Aug 21
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/66.0.3359.181 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Enable VoiceOver with COMMAND+F5. 2. In Chrome, visit https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/NOTE-wai-aria-practices-1.1-20171214/examples/alert/index.html 3. Click the "Trigger Alert" button. What is the expected behavior? VoiceOver speaks "Hej, hello, ciao, こんにちは, 안녕" What went wrong? Nothing is spoken. Did this work before? Yes Chrome 68 stable Chrome version: 69.0.3497.42 Channel: beta OS Version: 10.13.6 Flash Version: This was also not working in the Chrome 68 betas. Also tested against OSX Mojave beta 8 and observed identical results.
,
Aug 21
I have also reproduced this issue in Chrome 70.0.3529.3 (canary) on MacOS 10.13.6.
,
Aug 22
,
Aug 22
+pbommana@, could you pls try to repro and bisect? +dmazzoni@,could you ptal as this is M69 stable blocker?
,
Aug 22
Is it possible that you had MacViews on? It's an experiment, and there are known issues with live regions and alerts...
,
Aug 22
+ellyjones@, Any chance this is a macviews-related regression?
,
Aug 22
@dmazzoni, live regions have regressed even with MacViews off. This is probably the same as issue 875843
,
Aug 23
,
Aug 23
Able to reproduce issue on reported chrome version 69.0.3497.42 & on latest chrome 70.0.3530.0 using Mac 10.13.5. Hence providing bisect information below. NOTE:Issue related to Mac Bisect Info: ================ Good build: 69.0.3496.0 Bad build: 70.0.3500.0 CHANGELOG URL: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/bcb7db78edc13f57577f0a9562c98918bdcc10ae..67d21d10815fe6d87d1785a65a50fbc386e6605b suspect: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/67d21d10815fe6d87d1785a65a50fbc386e6605b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/977949 ellyjones@: Please confirm the issue and help in re-assigning if it is not related to your change. Thanks...!
,
Aug 23
My change enabled a gigantic experiment by default, so it certainly wasn't that specific change that caused this - especially if per #7 it regressed even with that experiment off. Per #7 this is a dupe of issue 875843 . |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by st...@desmos.com
, Aug 21