New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 875746 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner:
sprang@chromium.org
Closed: Aug 20
Cc:
nisse@chromium.org
ilnik@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.2%-103.8% regression in webrtc_perf_tests at 24250:24253

Project Member Reported by ilnik@chromium.org, Aug 20 
This CL most likely caused issues:
https://webrtc.googlesource.com/src/+/b6b1cacd09451c50933b28d6cdb040140de18594

Most troublesome is very small time between freezes on some Win tests.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 20 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=875746

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=7b6496a34ddcc6f492a1c1524140cf42f0c23b848936c9081cee0154d5d9173e


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

webrtc-android-tests-nexus4-lollipop
webrtc-android-tests-nexus6-lollipop
webrtc-android-tests-nexus6-nougat
webrtc-win-large-tests

Comment 2 by sprang@chromium.org, Aug 20

Cc: nisse@chromium.org
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
The VP8 tests using two temporal layers is definitely caused by the cl linked in #1. Those all seem like improvements: fewer dropped frames with shorter time between rendered frames as result.

I think the VP9 KSVC changes are more likely caused by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=875391

cc nisse@ fyi

I'll close this one as wai.
►

Sign in to add a comment