New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 875367 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocking:
issue 839084



Sign in to add a comment

7.5%-18% regression in timeToFirstContentfulPaint,timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint at 581928:582102

Project Member Reported by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 17

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=875367

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=7f68d580974d35cd6d764a685526a8469185b965a667de5353cd1b98c9a20d6d


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf
Cc: oysteine@google.com
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/17b3e0fa640000

Enable Perfetto usage for the loading perf tests. by oysteine@google.com
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/49a68554cf5658d0cc3741a89db2fca1380a6fcc
227 → 255.6 (+28.61)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Blocking: 839084
Components: Speed>Tracing
Owner: oysteine@chromium.org
I'll dedupe a few more loading perf test regressions associated with the perfetto switch here.
 Issue 875365  has been merged into this issue.
 Issue 875362  has been merged into this issue.
 Issue 874876  has been merged into this issue.

Sign in to add a comment