Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.

This is another instance of an issue we have with fragment lists getting corrupted. I own the others and really need to look at this.

I uploaded a CL for this a while back: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1106378 - feel free to review that (I probably need to rebase it though - will do that as soon as I get a chance.)

The following revision refers to this bug:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/5375d2d54ec3ec139fb55f92427f4402ef5bafd3

commit 5375d2d54ec3ec139fb55f92427f4402ef5bafd3
Author: Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com>
Date: Thu Aug 16 15:20:57 2018

Avoid recursing in the FragmentData destructor

Too deep recursions can cause stack overflows.

Bug:  874759 
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux_layout_tests_slimming_paint_v2;master.tryserver.blink:linux_trusty_blink_rel
Change-Id: Ie532e28bceee4e7f1c3ab501b80c0e2f14be083a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1106378
Reviewed-by: Stephen Chenney <schenney@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#583657}
[modify] https://crrev.com/5375d2d54ec3ec139fb55f92427f4402ef5bafd3/third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/fragment_data.cc
[modify] https://crrev.com/5375d2d54ec3ec139fb55f92427f4402ef5bafd3/third_party/blink/renderer/core/paint/fragment_data.h

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 583654:583657.

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4824663142957056

Fuzzer: ochang_domfuzzer
Job Type: linux_asan_content_shell_drt
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Stack-overflow
Crash Address: 0x7ffefca1eff8
Crash State:
  std::__1::unique_ptr<blink::FragmentData, std::__1::default_delete<blink::Fragme
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=560084:560088
Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_content_shell_drt&range=583654:583657

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4824663142957056

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.

ClusterFuzz testcase 4824663142957056 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.