New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 873577 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Aug 13
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Mac
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Stack-overflow in blink::LayoutTable::UpdateLayout

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Aug 13

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4989011240943616

Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified
Job Type: mac_asan_content_shell
Platform Id: mac

Crash Type: Stack-overflow
Crash Address: 0x7fff5b782240
Crash State:
  blink::LayoutTable::UpdateLayout
  blink::LayoutBlockFlow::PositionAndLayoutOnceIfNeeded
  blink::LayoutBlockFlow::LayoutBlockChild
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=mac_asan_content_shell&range=578673:578691

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4989011240943616

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 13

Labels: OS-Linux
Project Member

Comment 2 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 13

Components: Blink>Layout
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
Project Member

Comment 3 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 13

Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Owner
Owner: dtapu...@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9d0fd86cf833cd7f35eea342f15c827516938d67 (Introduce wtf_size_t which is typedef for uint32_t.).

If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Stack overflow for deeply nested content => WontFix.
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 20

Labels: Needs-Feedback
ClusterFuzz testcase 4989011240943616 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk).

If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase.

Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.

Sign in to add a comment