New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 872321 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Assigned
Owner:
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Windows , Chrome , Mac
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Out-of-memory in swiftshader_vertex_routine_fuzzer

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Aug 8

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6644155089682432

Fuzzer: libFuzzer_swiftshader_vertex_routine_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_chrome_asan
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Out-of-memory (exceeds 2048 MB)
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  swiftshader_vertex_routine_fuzzer
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_chrome_asan&range=529743:529752

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6644155089682432

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/testing/libfuzzer/reference.md for more information.
 
Cc: kkaluri@chromium.org
Components: Internals>GPU>SwiftShader
Labels: M-69 Test-Predator-Wrong CF-NeedsTriage
Unable to find actual suspect through code search and also observing no CL's under regression range, hence adding appropriate label and requesting someone from dev team to look in to this issue.

Cc: kbr@chromium.org
Owner: sugoi@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
There is a swiftshader roll inside regression range.
Cc: capn@chromium.org
Cc: -kbr@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, Oct 9

Labels: OS-Mac
Project Member

Comment 6 by ClusterFuzz, Oct 10

Labels: OS-Windows
Labels: -M-69 -CF-NeedsTriage M-71 M-70
Project Member

Comment 8 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 1

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 6644155089682432 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Labels: -Unreproducible Reproducible
Please ignore the last comment about testcase being unreproducible. The testcase is still reproducible. This happened due to a code refactoring on ClusterFuzz side, and the underlying root cause is now fixed. Resetting the label back to Reproducible. Sorry about the inconvenience caused from these incorrect notifications.
Project Member

Comment 11 by ClusterFuzz, Dec 17

Labels: OS-Chrome

Sign in to add a comment