Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
27.8% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 580814:580824 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 8
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e74778640000
,
Aug 8
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14e74778640000 Roll AFDO from 70.0.3513.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3514.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/07987725b8d4091cb2efe7b776e191efd8ae0a1d 88.19 → 64 (-24.19) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 70.0.3513.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3514.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Aug 8
Sigh. Looks like more recent afdo-induced flakiness (see also issue 872168 and issue 872165 ). Please note, though, that the most recent drop (at r581372) was due to a revert to a few-days-old AFDO profile to help triage a bug. We've since turned the autoroller back on, so the most recent profiles might have stabilized. I'm wrapping up an investigation about how AFDO interacts with binary size now. I'll keep an eye on this graph, and if it keeps fluctuating, make it the next thing on my list.
,
Aug 9
,
Aug 15
Looks stable + back to pre-regression levels again |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 8