Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
32.2% regression in blink_perf.css at 580792:580800 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 8
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11cf6da4640000
,
Aug 8
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/11cf6da4640000 Roll AFDO from 70.0.3512.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3513.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/fec0224315eaaeb75b118b9b3705bad2423c48c6 1248 → 815.2 (-432.9) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 70.0.3512.0_rc-r1 to 70.0.3513.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Aug 8
Looks like this is basically undoing the perf gains from the 3512 profile roll. 3512 pretty seriously regressed bits of rasterize_and_record for both linux and nexus 5(x?) bots. So I'm betting that 3512 was just a wacky profile. Since there's no other obvious afdo-related flakes in (admittedly short) history here, all I can really say is "¯\_(ツ)_/¯". |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Aug 8