Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div.html failing on linux and win |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSeen here: https://ci.chromium.org/p/chromium/builders/luci.chromium.try/linux_chromium_rel_ng/157716 Layout test results: https://test-results.appspot.com/data/layout_results/linux_chromium_rel_ng/157716/layout-test-results/results.html Text diff: --- /b/s/w/ioROqAc0/layout-test-results/fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div-expected.txt +++ /b/s/w/ioROqAc0/layout-test-results/fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div-actual.txt @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ TEST COMPLETE PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "a" +FAIL gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") should be b. Was a. +FAIL gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") should be c. Was b. PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "b" -PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "c" -PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "b" -PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "b" +FAIL gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") should be b. Was a. PASS gFocusedDocument.activeElement.getAttribute("id") is "a" Marking P1 because this is blocking the CQ. This blocked an entirely unrelated CL from landing.
,
Aug 8
Failure expectations added in https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1166562. Assigning based on git blame.
,
Aug 8
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/167a1685c3314ac1acf6ee4e759272bca54839b7 commit 167a1685c3314ac1acf6ee4e759272bca54839b7 Author: Rakina Zata Amni <rakina@chromium.org> Date: Wed Aug 08 04:55:28 2018 Disable Layout test flaky fail, timeout, crash TBR=futhark@chromium.org Bug: 869470 ,871105,872025, 871416 Change-Id: Iab76b2330c889d36243f95f3c105f9bba7568819 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1166564 Commit-Queue: Rakina Zata Amni <rakina@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rakina Zata Amni <rakina@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#581476} [modify] https://crrev.com/167a1685c3314ac1acf6ee4e759272bca54839b7/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations
,
Aug 8
If it doesn't fail on Mac, can we keep it running on the Mac bots? Otherwise snav-stay-in-overflow-div.html won't have any automated testing at all. When I loop this test on my Linux workstation, I see it being flaky as well. I hope that https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/998193 will fix the flakiness.
,
Sep 4
,
Sep 4
,
Sep 4
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/a1cdbbb544c358e70f7475dac02ee23f1897dfd3 commit a1cdbbb544c358e70f7475dac02ee23f1897dfd3 Author: Hugo Holgersson <hugoh@vewd.com> Date: Tue Sep 04 11:59:18 2018 Snav: Make snav-stay-in-overflow-div.html use snav-testharness.js This fixes a flakiness that has been haunting this test for a while. It used to flake ~ 4/100 times: $ python third_party/WebKit/Tools/Scripts/run-webkit-tests --repeat-each=100 -t Release LayoutTests/fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div.html Now, even 1000 runs pass. snav-testharness.js does not use requestAnimationFrame(). The old helper, spatial-navigation-utils.js, did. Different rAF-timings probably caused the flakiness. Bug: 803086, 871416 Change-Id: Idbf0bfb544236ba1a77986c7d62200b2e17d6884 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1185188 Commit-Queue: Hugo Holgersson <hugoh@vewd.com> Reviewed-by: Fredrik Söderquist <fs@opera.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#588491} [modify] https://crrev.com/a1cdbbb544c358e70f7475dac02ee23f1897dfd3/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/TestExpectations [delete] https://crrev.com/b9916fe70686f0bec51f442265120949ae2281ed/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div-expected.txt [modify] https://crrev.com/a1cdbbb544c358e70f7475dac02ee23f1897dfd3/third_party/WebKit/LayoutTests/fast/spatial-navigation/snav-stay-in-overflow-div.html |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by futhark@chromium.org
, Aug 7