PageLoad.PaintTiming.NavigationToFirstContentfulPaint reporting many 0 and overflowed values on Android |
||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee UMA link: https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2/?sid=7f7335bbb4c7103c76be0f883d4b51ba This looks to have been triggered in regression range: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/69.0.3457.0..69.0.3462.0?pretty=fuller&n=10000 And partially mitigated in regression range: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/70.0.3502.0..70.0.3503.0?pretty=fuller&n=10000 However, there's still more mass in the 0 bucket (~3%) than there used to be.
,
Aug 10
Tim, I think you were looking at issues with Android timestamps, could this be related?
,
Aug 10
We have an issue that the swap time of FCP, FP etc have 0.3s difference from the screenshot timestamp. But it's not as far as being 0.
,
Aug 13
I think https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/3821fdf5c54add24d02adef248a311c293ea0bd0 is probably responsible. I thought sadrul@ already had a bug for this, but I couldn't find it...
,
Aug 13
GLFence was disabled on android (https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1155472 landed on Jul 30). It doesn't look like that has made a difference in the UMA. So it is likely that there are some other issues involved.
,
Aug 14
,
Aug 14
Could either of 691239ed7c0738ac3f6dc37a1d026958e039903c or bd6ad56b4f186dc9db574c3d4ef3bd572ea3cd11 have caused the major fix? This would imply GLFence was probably responsible for the large dip. This still doesn't explain the persisting small dip in the graph.
,
Aug 14
691239ed7c0738ac3f6dc37a1d026958e039903c is mac-only
,
Aug 14
Oh sorry. Maybe the fix is actually 6c51f537164d29b80ba89ca51fd94721873bd85c ? Other OS do not show dips and the implementation is pretty much shared so it seems to me like some sort of timer issue is the most likely problem. Is it possible to view a graph with the counts of the 0 bucket?
,
Aug 15
You can view the histogram at various points in time, but you can't view a timeline of the counts in the zero bucket without writing custom queries.
,
Sep 21
I am looking at FCP in M69, and noticed that there seem to be a lot of large outliers. See [1]; M68 and M69 performance is similar if one looks at percentile (even 99%) or trimmed mean, but when looking at the arithmetic mean, there is a large increase in M69, suggesting that there are more and/or larger outliers. Could that be related to this bug? [1] https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2?sid=fb5d0902f931aabbad817a41bdb27070
,
Sep 21
,
Sep 25
,
Sep 26
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f962a47e219a605eb9648251df3d76471fe06bd9 commit f962a47e219a605eb9648251df3d76471fe06bd9 Author: Nicolas Pena <npm@chromium.org> Date: Wed Sep 26 16:01:46 2018 Paint timing: revert back to swap-time This CL is a minimal change to use swap time instead of presentation time in PageLoad.PaintTiming.NavigationToFirstContentfulPaint. This is a tentative fix for the unexpected regressions in the metric. The change is minimal since it may require a merge to Stable. A followup change will record the presentation timestamp, or the delta with the swap timestamp, in a separate metric. Bug: 870707 Change-Id: I1b48968d010bbd6120a6fbac59e26dc789d23394 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1244371 Reviewed-by: Timothy Dresser <tdresser@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Antoine Labour <piman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#594331} [modify] https://crrev.com/f962a47e219a605eb9648251df3d76471fe06bd9/content/renderer/gpu/layer_tree_view.cc
,
Oct 2
I'm setting up a Finch trial (no data yet on that). When this is live, half of Canary/Dev will use swap and the other half will use presentation. Right now, Canary is using swap timestamps. Preliminary graphs suggest that FCP values are back to 'normal' after reverting to swap timestamps. Graphs I'm looking at: https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2/?sid=a069baf2dc8df31c70af71dbaba4b441 https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2?sid=37763ffe35d196ecdcffcf0753ec5007 https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/timeline_v2?sid=8fa1831a1a53d39ebd828498677b6093
,
Oct 2
Requesting merge to M70 to recover FCP metric. The changed is considered safe because it reverts back to the behavior before M69.
,
Oct 2
This bug requires manual review: We are only 13 days from stable. Please contact the milestone owner if you have questions. Owners: benmason@(Android), kariahda@(iOS), geohsu@(ChromeOS), abdulsyed@(Desktop) For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Oct 3
Hi there -- I would very much like to see this fix in M70. The regression on the FCP metrics is causing a bunch of problems for our performance tracking dashboards for NBU, and getting this fixed in the next milestone is quite high priority for us. Thanks!
,
Oct 3
This affects other OS as well so adding the ones we know are affected for sure. Ping on milestone owners for approval.
,
Oct 4
Fix looks safe and has been in canary since 71.0.3563.0 with no side-effects. Approved to merge to 70, branch 3538.
,
Oct 4
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/012527ecf5ced6845fbea843375f441a517b502a commit 012527ecf5ced6845fbea843375f441a517b502a Author: Nicolas Pena <npm@chromium.org> Date: Thu Oct 04 15:13:14 2018 [M70] Paint timing: revert back to swap-time This CL is a minimal change to use swap time instead of presentation time in PageLoad.PaintTiming.NavigationToFirstContentfulPaint. This is a tentative fix for the unexpected regressions in the metric. The change is minimal since it may require a merge to Stable. A followup change will record the presentation timestamp, or the delta with the swap timestamp, in a separate metric. Bug: 870707 Change-Id: I1b48968d010bbd6120a6fbac59e26dc789d23394 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1244371 Reviewed-by: Timothy Dresser <tdresser@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Antoine Labour <piman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#594331}(cherry picked from commit f962a47e219a605eb9648251df3d76471fe06bd9) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1262035 Reviewed-by: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3538@{#850} Cr-Branched-From: 79f7c91a2b2a2932cd447fa6f865cb6662fa8fa6-refs/heads/master@{#587811} [modify] https://crrev.com/012527ecf5ced6845fbea843375f441a517b502a/content/renderer/gpu/layer_tree_view.cc
,
Oct 4
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/012527ecf5ced6845fbea843375f441a517b502a Commit: 012527ecf5ced6845fbea843375f441a517b502a Author: npm@chromium.org Commiter: npm@chromium.org Date: 2018-10-04 15:13:14 +0000 UTC [M70] Paint timing: revert back to swap-time This CL is a minimal change to use swap time instead of presentation time in PageLoad.PaintTiming.NavigationToFirstContentfulPaint. This is a tentative fix for the unexpected regressions in the metric. The change is minimal since it may require a merge to Stable. A followup change will record the presentation timestamp, or the delta with the swap timestamp, in a separate metric. Bug: 870707 Change-Id: I1b48968d010bbd6120a6fbac59e26dc789d23394 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1244371 Reviewed-by: Timothy Dresser <tdresser@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Antoine Labour <piman@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#594331}(cherry picked from commit f962a47e219a605eb9648251df3d76471fe06bd9) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1262035 Reviewed-by: Nicolás Peña Moreno <npm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/branch-heads/3538@{#850} Cr-Branched-From: 79f7c91a2b2a2932cd447fa6f865cb6662fa8fa6-refs/heads/master@{#587811}
,
Oct 4
|
||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by schenney@chromium.org
, Aug 3