New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 869972 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Sep 12
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Direct-leak in dri2_initialize_surfaceless

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Aug 1

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5129516264194048

Fuzzer: libFuzzer_chromeos_virgl_fuzzer
Job Type: libfuzzer_asan_chromeos
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Direct-leak
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  dri2_initialize_surfaceless
  dri2_initialize
  _eglMatchDriver
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=libfuzzer_asan_chromeos&range=2801419:2801745

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5129516264194048

Issue filed automatically.

See https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/master/fuzzing.md#Reproducing-crashes-from-ClusterFuzz for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 1

Cc: davidriley@google.com marcheu@google.com zachr@google.com
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Auto-CC
Automatically adding ccs based on OWNERS file / target commit history.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label.
Cc: metzman@chromium.org
This shouldn't be occurring because there is a suppression for eglInitialize based allocations.

Essentially to get a good balance of performance and avoiding other memory leaks, I chose to take the one time leak of eglInitialize resources when implementing the fuzzer.
Components: Internals>GPU
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Ignore
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
davidriley: this sounds like it's a WontFix? Please reopen if I'm misunderstanding comment #2.
Owner: metzman@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: WontFix)
I thought that metzman@ was investigating why the suppressions were not properly working which should fix this issue.

Sorry, this seems to have slipped my mind. I will try to take a look this week or next.
Project Member

Comment 7 by ClusterFuzz, Sep 12

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5129516264194048 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
Project Member

Comment 8 by ClusterFuzz, Sep 12

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5129516264194048 is flaky and no longer crashes, so closing issue.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.

Sign in to add a comment