New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 868354 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 868148
Owner:
Closed: Jul 27
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.9%-21.5% regression in blink_perf.css at 578231:578254

Project Member Reported by pmeenan@chromium.org, Jul 27

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=868354

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=37839966bbd899ab265a0bf839c0108d19ee76398ac3e282e5a401f0bf05e91d


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

mac-10_12_laptop_low_end-perf
mac-10_13_laptop_high_end-perf
Cc: kojii@chromium.org
Owner: kojii@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit.
https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/129bebfda40000

[LayoutNG] Batch computing glyph bounds for ShapeResult by kojii@chromium.org
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/342e3c40354fd928391a96eab740d145a7d23e75
26.46 → 32.84 (+6.386)

Understanding performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
Mergedinto: 868148
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment