Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.3% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 577424:577437 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 26
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13eb0b3ba40000
,
Jul 27
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/13eb0b3ba40000 [cleanup] Move handle() function to handles-inl.h by herhut@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/7ead0c146e16661951583d18fda64a73492910c0 2930 → 3256 (+326.8) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jul 27
This only regresses on macos. I will have to investigate on a mac. Maybe it is a specific compiler version that triggers different inlining. I ran the benchmark with tools/perf/run_benchmark blink_perf.bindings --browser=exact --browser-executable=out/Release/chrome --story-filter=gc-tree --show-stdout |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 26