New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 866257 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Indirect-leak in allocateRaw

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Jul 21

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5709689405571072

Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified
Job Type: linux_lsan_chrome_mp
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: Indirect-leak
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  allocateRaw
  sw::allocate
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_lsan_chrome_mp&range=495528:495712

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5709689405571072

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Jul 21

Components: Internals>GPU>SwiftShader
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
Cc: kkaluri@chromium.org
Labels: M-68 Test-Predator-Wrong
Owner: capn@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Since it related to Swiftshader component, assigning it to capn@ for further triage.
Labels: ClusterFuzz-Wrong
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Couldn't reproduce a crash, and the clusterfuzz reproduce tool claims that this result matched the original report. Also, the report doesn't have a stack trace that I can work with. I suspect a ClusterFuzz issue.
Project Member

Comment 4 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 9

Labels: Needs-Feedback
ClusterFuzz testcase 5709689405571072 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk).

If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase.

Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.
Project Member

Comment 5 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 16

Labels: -Reproducible Unreproducible
ClusterFuzz testcase 5709689405571072 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.

Sign in to add a comment