Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
A zero-to-nonzero to 21.3% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1531966583:1531987876 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 19
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940541165353599536
,
Jul 21
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: webview-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/background_media/background_media_imgur Revision Result N android-chrome@cd22f0f943 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@cd22f0f943,chromium@576157 0.0 +- 0.0 6 good android-chrome@c0e3d62ff2 1048576 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940541165353599536 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 19