Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-4.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1531909421:1531934250 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 19
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940543830653801280
,
Jul 19
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Change : 0.80% | 26046582.4762 -> 26255478.4762 Revision Result N android-chrome@74662f91c8 26046582 +- 264620 21 good android-chrome@478583399d 26255478 +- 326093 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940543830653801280 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 20
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940472336304171136
,
Jul 22
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Change : 0.56% | 26327357.5238 -> 26473838.2857 Revision Result N android-chrome@478583399d 26327358 +- 204499 21 good android-chrome@fdbeca77e3 26296833 +- 113562 14 good android-chrome@fdbeca77e3,chromium@575988 --- --- build failure android-chrome@fdbeca77e3,chromium@575989 26524551 +- 35203.4 6 bad android-chrome@934b6671a2 26461745 +- 142905 21 bad android-chrome@5bcd964863 26473838 +- 251266 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.youtube.com.results.q.science memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940472336304171136 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 24
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940121227183889440
,
Jul 24
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author sigurds@chromium.org === Hi sigurds@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sigurd Schneider Commit : 46a78fbedfcd458f5d35097bdf1a9947644f4b0e Date : Tue Jul 17 15:33:20 2018 Subject: Revert "[embedded-builtins] Enable on all arches except x86 for benchmarks" Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_dirty_size_avg/background/after_http_search_yahoo_com_search__ylt_p_google Change : 2.18% | 22948060.0 -> 23448454.6667 Revision Result N android-chrome@e5eafcf94f 22948060 +- 88600.6 6 good android-chrome@74662f91c8 23038172 +- 78350.4 6 good android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575926 23113265 +- 120659 6 good android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575929 23103025 +- 107770 6 good android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575929,v8@46a78fbedf 23493511 +- 106926 6 bad <-- android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575929,v8@e3a5b1e402 23492828 +- 104227 6 bad android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575929,v8@16af1baac4 23556316 +- 162359 6 bad android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575930 23509895 +- 142542 6 bad android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575931 23425244 +- 100898 6 bad android-chrome@74662f91c8,chromium@575935 23436167 +- 85278.2 6 bad android-chrome@1032e70048 23448455 +- 147448 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.search.yahoo.com.search..ylt.p.google memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8940121227183889440 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 26
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 19