Indirect-leak in base::WaitableEvent::WaitableEvent |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5747525114658816 Fuzzer: attekett_dom_fuzzer Job Type: linux_lsan_chrome_mp Platform Id: linux Crash Type: Indirect-leak Crash Address: Crash State: base::WaitableEvent::WaitableEvent content::ChildProcess::ChildProcess content::GpuProcess::GpuProcess Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5747525114658816 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Jul 20
ClusterFuzz testcase 5747525114658816 appears to be flaky, updating reproducibility label.
,
Jul 20
Why is it complaining about a stack allocated WaitableEvent being leaked?
,
Jul 20
Wontfix given the reproducibility and given that at worst this is a leak of a singleton (but I also don't think we leak it). |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Jul 19Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components