binaryen_wasm_fuzzer set up incorrectly? |
|
Issue descriptionThe new binaryen_wasm_fuzzer found two bugs: 1) https://clusterfuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/5286025870704640?noredirect=1 2) https://clusterfuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/6612060516122624?noredirect=1 But then it failed to reproduce them since it used the "linux_d8_dbg" bot instead of the original "linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg". These are totally different bots, in particular one is executing 32-bit code, the other 64-bit. Re-uploading the same test cases, and selecting "linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg" manually worked, and we now get regression ranges and everything: 1) https://clusterfuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/5189487907569664 2) https://clusterfuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/6347432926117888 Is this a configuration error on the binaryen_wasm_fuzzer? Or what would cause it to try reproducing on another bot than the one which found the bug?
,
Sep 4
Thanks for clarifying! |
|
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|
Comment 1 by infe...@chromium.org
, Aug 16