Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-1.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 1530324885:1530343670 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 3
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942005521134495408
,
Jul 4
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_m_intl_taobao_com_group_purchase_html Change : 0.82% | 30036790.8571 -> 30284480.2381 Revision Result N android-chrome@e1215825f7 30036791 +- 338875 21 good android-chrome@cd28519e8e 30284480 +- 470180 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.intl.taobao.com.group.purchase.html memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942005521134495408 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 20
Can't see bots any more. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jul 3