I don't know much about bidi, so I can't tell what's right and wrong here, but we do differ from legacy layout (see test case), and the only thing preventing us from failing fast/borders/bidi-009a.html is that we currently fall back to legacy layout due to an anonymous table-cell (I'm in the process of fixing that).

The test attached is based on that test.

From the looks of it, fast/borders/bidi-002.html also fails because of this bug.

I hope someone with more knowledge can update the bug summary with a better title. :)
 

Deleted: tc.html 116 bytes

tc.html 116 bytes View Download