New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 859312 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Verified
Owner:
Closed: Aug 30
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

CHECK failure: #32 ADDRESS (/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+ADDRESS) in verifier.cc

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, Jun 30 2018

Issue description

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5901981877796864

Fuzzer: binaryen_wasm_fuzzer
Job Type: linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  #32 ADDRESS  (/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+ADDRESS) in verifier.cc
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg&range=51789:51790

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5901981877796864

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
 
Project Member

Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 30 2018

Components: Blink>JavaScript>Compiler
Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components
Automatically applying components based on crash stacktrace and information from OWNERS files.

If this is incorrect, please apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-Components label.
Project Member

Comment 2 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 30 2018

Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Owner
Owner: gdeepti@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Automatically assigning owner based on suspected regression changelist https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/41ceccc5dba1526deaf670da765de69d73495879 ([wasm] Add I64{Exchange, CompareExchange} ops for x64).

If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label. If you aren't the correct owner for this issue, please unassign yourself as soon as possible so it can be re-triaged.
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 1

Labels: Pri-1
Labels: M-69 Security_Impact-Head
Project Member

Comment 5 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 3

Labels: ReleaseBlock-Stable
This is a serious security regression. If you are not able to fix this quickly, please revert the change that introduced it.

If this doesn't affect a release branch, or has not been properly classified for severity, please update the Security_Impact or Security_Severity labels, and remove the ReleaseBlock label. To disable this altogether, apply ReleaseBlock-NA.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Components: -Blink>JavaScript -Blink>JavaScript>Compiler Blink>JavaScript>WebAssembly
Labels: -Security_Impact-Head -Security_Severity-High -ReleaseBlock-Stable -M-69 Security_Severity-Medium Security_Impact-None
Pending on Arm I64Atomics, crashes only behing --experimental-wasm-threads - updating labels accordingly. 
Labels: -Pri-1 Pri-2
Project Member

Comment 8 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 30

ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 55498:55499.

Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=5901981877796864

Fuzzer: binaryen_wasm_fuzzer
Job Type: linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg
Platform Id: linux

Crash Type: CHECK failure
Crash Address: 
Crash State:
  #32 ADDRESS  (/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+ADDRESS) in verifier.cc
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg&range=51789:51790
Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_d8_v8_arm_dbg&range=55498:55499

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=5901981877796864

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
Project Member

Comment 9 by ClusterFuzz, Aug 30

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Verified
Status: Verified (was: Assigned)
ClusterFuzz testcase 5901981877796864 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified.

If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue.
Project Member

Comment 10 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Aug 30

Labels: -Restrict-View-SecurityTeam Restrict-View-SecurityNotify

Comment 11 Deleted

Comment 12 Deleted

Labels: -Type-Bug-Security -Restrict-View-SecurityNotify -reward-topanel -Security_Severity-Medium -Security_Impact-None reward-0 Type-Bug
The VRP panel looked at this and deemed it not to be a security bug, sorry!

Sign in to add a comment