Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
0.4% regression in sizes at 570361:570361 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 26 2018
Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because this autoroll is the only CL in range: Roll AFDO from 69.0.3472.0_rc-r1 to 69.0.3473.0_rc-r1 This CL may cause a small binary size increase, roughly proportional to how long it's been since our last AFDO profile roll. For larger increases (around or exceeding 100KB), please file a bug against gbiv@chromium.org. Additional context: https://crbug.com/805539 The AutoRoll server is located here: https://afdo-chromium-roll.skia.org Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/autoroll/README.md If the roll is causing failures, please contact the current sheriff, who should be CC'd on the roll, and stop the roller if necessary. TBR=gbiv@chromium.org Change-Id: I49e0b9d21a920a916e3335a38d5871c1cb131c59 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1114476 Commit-Queue: afdo-chromium-autoroll <afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: afdo-chromium-autoroll <afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#570361}
,
Jun 26 2018
0.4% is more than what I'd expect for an AFDO roll, but it looks like the roll from 3448 to 3449 saved us 0.4%, and the roll from 3350 to 3372 saved us another 0.1%, (rolls were disabled between 3350 and 3372, due to issue 851539 ) so I'm attributing this to noise. Noise investigations (both perf and size) are being tracked in issue 849881. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 26 2018