1] Component Name: Internals>Network>HTTP 

2] Parent Component (e.g. Blink, UI>Browser, etc...): Internals>Network

3] Description of Component: That's the problem - it's unclear what it covers.  HTTP/1.x / HTTP/0.9 parser specific issues would have a clear owner, but that's very little code.  It's often applied to a random subset of network bugs.  Things that cover issues which affect HTTP/2 and QUIC as well, parsing the content of specific headers, cache header handling (Which are cache issues), issues at the URLRequest layer, mime sniffing issues, etc.

It's applied sufficiently broadly that there seems to be no gain from separating it out from the general Internals>Network label.

4] Admin/ Owner: None.

5] Please specify what triage practices will be followed for the component
(i.e. what team will do it and how frequently).

That's the real problem here - it bypasses our bug triage process.  Rather than adjusting our triage practices to treat it just like Internals>Network, it seems better to just merge the component into Internals>Network.

I've talk to both the network and network core team managers about this (lassy and mef), and neither had objections to this.