Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
35.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1528955187:1529642116 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 25 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942757899790625760
,
Jun 26 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: webview-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Change : 46.41% | 4361947.42857 -> 6329782.85714 Revision Result N android-chrome@ca1c4e48aa 4361947 +- 98060.4 14 good android-chrome@b268028c43 6329783 +- 51101.8 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942757899790625760 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 25 2018