Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.2% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 569862:569870 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 25 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/139603a3240000
,
Jun 26 2018
📍 Found a significant difference after 1 commit. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/139603a3240000 Revert "[array] Change QuickSort to TimSort for Array.p.sort" by clemensh@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/8723374b4aa4dd1307315d994bae8828de19c950 1029 → 916.7 (-111.9) Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jun 26 2018
This is expected. The original CL landed to gather some performance data (see comments: https://crrev.com/c/1111959). It improves performance, so the revert regresses performance.
,
Jun 26 2018
,
Jun 26 2018
Pinpoint results look weird, the initial land of TimSort does not move the needle, but the revert does. Possibly flaky?
,
Jun 26 2018
Yeah, maybe just a flake. It recovered a bit later. Still WontFix ;) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 25 2018