CHECK failure: LayoutPoint(IntPoint(paint_offset.X().ToInt(), paint_offset.Y().ToInt())) == pai |
||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6639051885772800 Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3 Job Type: linux_debug_chrome Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: LayoutPoint(IntPoint(paint_offset.X().ToInt(), paint_offset.Y().ToInt())) == pai blink::ViewPainter::Paint blink::LayoutView::Paint Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=569874:569875 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6639051885772800 Issue filed automatically. See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.
,
Jun 23 2018
Automatically adding ccs based on suspected regression changelists: Updating trunk VERSION from 3470.0 to 3471.0 by chrome-release-bot@chromium.org - https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/d23e33081122f79de9ef059f4cdedc4c4fb96458 If this is incorrect, please let us know why and apply the Test-Predator-Wrong-CLs label.
,
Jun 25 2018
trchen@, is this something we need to have as P1? If so set back. Also re-assign if this is someone else's territory.
,
Jun 25 2018
Hmm, this is very sketchy. Obviously the bisect is wrong, but I can reliably repro this locally so it's probably not a flake. I also guessed that it is probably clamping problem, but the raw (unnormalized) value of paint_offset was (-1, 0). While I don't think this is a big issue, but worth to be investigated when I have spare cycles.
,
Jul 3
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 572098:572099. Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=6639051885772800 Fuzzer: ifratric-browserfuzzer-v3 Job Type: linux_debug_chrome Platform Id: linux Crash Type: CHECK failure Crash Address: Crash State: LayoutPoint(IntPoint(paint_offset.X().ToInt(), paint_offset.Y().ToInt())) == pai blink::ViewPainter::Paint blink::LayoutView::Paint Sanitizer: address (ASAN) Regressed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=569874:569875 Fixed: https://clusterfuzz.com/revisions?job=linux_debug_chrome&range=572098:572099 Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=6639051885772800 See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Jul 3
ClusterFuzz testcase 6639051885772800 is verified as fixed, so closing issue as verified. If this is incorrect, please add ClusterFuzz-Wrong label and re-open the issue. |
||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||||
Comment 1 by ClusterFuzz
, Jun 23 2018Labels: Test-Predator-Auto-Components