Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21.6%-110.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1529386777:1529407195 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 20 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943215560067497536
,
Jun 20 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-512-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Change : 0.17% | 11679246.1905 -> 11659501.3333 Revision Result N android-chrome@8e54c6dbe8 11679246 +- 366800 21 good android-chrome@4ea344bada 11659501 +- 407387 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943215560067497536 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 20 2018