Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Significant performance regression when printing multi-page table with dotted border
Reported by
qu...@swydo.com,
Jun 19 2018
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/69.0.3451.0 Safari/537.36 Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. Create a table with a <thead> containing many rows (the more the better). 2. Add <table> style "border-collapse: collapse;" and <tr> style "border-top: 1px solid #000". 3. Print the page, observe great performance. 4. Change <tr> style to "border-top: 1px dotted #000". 5. Print the page, observe performance is significantly worse. To narrow down the issue further: 6. Add <thead> style "display: table-row-group;" 7. Print page, observe performance is similar to solid border. What is the expected behavior? Performance printing solid borders and dotted borders should be similar, even when table headers are repeating. What went wrong? There is a significant performance penalty when using dotted table row borders when table headers are repeated on multiple pages. Did this work before? Yes 67.0.3396.87 Chrome version: 69.0.3451.0 Channel: dev OS Version: OS X 10.13.3 Flash Version: We're also seeing this issue on Linux 68.0.3440.17. In our testing with approx. 2000 rows the performance difference is very significant. The "solid border" and "no repeating headers" documents are printed in < 1s, while the "dotted border" document takes over ten seconds.
,
Jun 19 2018
,
Jun 20 2018
Able to reproduce the issue on the reported chrome 69.0.3451.0,latest chrome 69.0.3466.0 using Mac OS 10.13.5,Windows10,Ubuntu17.10. Below is the bisect information for same. Bisect Info: ================ Good build: 69.0.3446.0 Bad build: 69.0.3447.0 CHANGELOG URL:https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/858211c2dfafafdee23d0d0ed8ac09f87ec0ce6d..4ed270af2dfc4dc15c8306978c6774031a0ad1db Suspect: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/4ed270af2dfc4dc15c8306978c6774031a0ad1db Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1079454 wangxianzhu:Please confirm the issue and help in re-assigning if it is not related to your change. Thanks!
,
Jun 21 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by susan.boorgula@chromium.org
, Jun 19 2018