The following metrics could help to see if and how the keyboard accessory is used:
a) Impressions of keyboard accessory (opened for buckets: text input, password input, other)
b) Opening a bottom sheet (bucket for type of sheet: passwords, payments, etc.)
c) Closing a bottom sheet (bucket for type of sheet: passwords, payments, etc.)
d) Impressions of the automatic "Generate strong password" button
e) Clicks on the "automatic Generate strong password" button
f) Clicks on the manual "Generate strong password" button
g) Clicks on the "Show all passwords" link
h) Clicks on a credential (bucket for type of credential)
i) Number of credential pairs (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, >5)
Note: a pair of impressions and clicks help to determine the click-through-rate (CTR) which helps to find out how often the feature was actually used, e.g. a&c, d&e, b&f, b&g, b&h
For dynamic content, it might be interesting to see how often users face only the default actions, e.g. many a) and b) but small number of d) or mainly bucket 0 in i).
Metrics for consideration:
j) Position of a clicked credential - is ranking important? Maybe to hide credentials if there are a lot and only the first few are actually useful.
k) UKM for etld+1 - This would show where the auto-filling stopped working. Do we have comparable metrics for Desktop?
Comment 1 by fhorschig@chromium.org
, Jun 18 2018