Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.5% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1528955187:1528964698 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 14 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943706236213517072
,
Jun 16 2018
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author kylechar@chromium.org === Hi kylechar@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : kylechar Commit : f77f6b8dba2776e23111c84c5d9333dbb03039fe Date : Wed Jun 13 20:29:11 2018 Subject: Fix UseSurfaceLayerForVideo GPU crash handling. Bisect Details Configuration: webview-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:private_footprint_size_avg/background_news/background_news_nytimes Change : 6.51% | 86316373.3333 -> 91934720.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@ca1c4e48aa 86316373 +- 303653 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105 87217493 +- 751473 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566949 87280981 +- 580341 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566970 86783317 +- 914950 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566971 91340800 +- 664275 6 bad <-- android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566972 91776341 +- 437100 6 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566973 91519659 +- 619863 6 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566975 91467776 +- 974951 6 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566980 90930517 +- 452050 6 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566991 91642539 +- 859284 6 bad android-chrome@f6b5646c5d 92066475 +- 741941 6 bad android-chrome@adcd19c5ad 91934720 +- 525273 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.news.nytimes system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943706236213517072 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 16 2018
Issue 853005 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jun 16 2018
Issue 853007 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jun 17 2018
Issue 852840 has been merged into this issue.
,
Jun 18 2018
,
Jun 22 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943008766676657344
,
Jun 24 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: TIMEOUT The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: ca1c4e48aa84623f6f0c62214bdc831cc324f791 bad_revision : f6b5646c5dfcbdc2dd9bea0a5262039a148fe621 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Change : 14.23% | 13547861.3333 -> 15476053.3333 Revision Result N android-chrome@ca1c4e48aa 13547861 +- 1066063 6 good android-chrome@f6b5646c5d 15679943 +- 769254 9 bad android-chrome@adcd19c5ad 15476053 +- 590067 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8943008766676657344 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 25 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942744216928589056
,
Jun 26 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sadrul Habib Chowdhury Commit : 3821fdf5c54add24d02adef248a311c293ea0bd0 Date : Wed Jun 13 19:50:51 2018 Subject: presentation feedback: Use a GLFence fallback. Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_drive Change : 11.32% | 16453290.6667 -> 18315946.6667 Revision Result N android-chrome@ca1c4e48aa 16453291 +- 573242 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105 16437248 +- 722681 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566949 16349867 +- 903034 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566955 16496981 +- 317931 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566957 16584363 +- 342011 6 good android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566958 18680036 +- 1202089 9 bad <-- android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566960 18370332 +- 941261 9 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566970 18982002 +- 1232690 9 bad android-chrome@2158fc5105,chromium@566991 19102379 +- 385866 6 bad android-chrome@f6b5646c5d 18315947 +- 650976 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.drive system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8942744216928589056 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 14 2018