Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.4%-5.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1527515353:1527535866 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 7 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944399894679860160
,
Jun 9 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 722d4fc08892853358878a612b91d1025bda2105 bad_revision : 4c136b3e1c68e1d47550e48ba9031696e37198d6 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_facebook_photos Change : 5.50% | 3298923.71429 -> 3480245.33333 Revision Result N android-chrome@3e8ad5c58a 3298924 +- 21595.9 14 good android-chrome@722d4fc088 3298791 +- 14880.7 9 good android-chrome@4c136b3e1c 3480245 +- 162347 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.facebook.photos system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944399894679860160 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jun 11 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944038447440763216
,
Jun 12 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-512-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion Change : 4.30% | 9438472.0 -> 9844732.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@722d4fc088 9438472 +- 60314.7 6 good android-chrome@4c136b3e1c 9844732 +- 67863.5 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944038447440763216 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Jun 7 2018