New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 850402 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Untriaged
Owner: ----
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.4%-5.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1527515353:1527535866

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@chromium.org, Jun 7 2018

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=850402

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=146405b5cd54ef3c2660cb8b4c51ac8617fce72d34b32e9926c923b58018ba42


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

health-plan-clankium-low-end-phone
perf-go-phone-1024
perf-go-phone-512

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Error: INFRA_FAILURE

The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with:
  good_revision: 722d4fc08892853358878a612b91d1025bda2105
  bad_revision : 4c136b3e1c68e1d47550e48ba9031696e37198d6

If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_facebook_photos
  Change       : 5.50% | 3298923.71429 -> 3480245.33333

Revision                       Result                  N
android-chrome@3e8ad5c58a      3298924 +- 21595.9      14      good
android-chrome@722d4fc088      3298791 +- 14880.7      9       good
android-chrome@4c136b3e1c      3480245 +- 162347       9       bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.facebook.photos system_health.memory_mobile

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944399894679860160


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 12 2018


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect was unable to run to completion

Please try rerunning the bisect.


If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: go-phone-512-perf-bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media/load_media_dailymotion
  Change       : 4.30% | 9438472.0 -> 9844732.0

Revision                       Result                  N
android-chrome@722d4fc088      9438472 +- 60314.7      6      good
android-chrome@4c136b3e1c      9844732 +- 67863.5      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.dailymotion system_health.memory_mobile

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8944038447440763216


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Components: Speed>Metrics>SystemHealthRegressions
Components: -Speed>Metrics>SystemHealthRegressions

Sign in to add a comment