New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 849200 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jun 2018
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 1
Type: ----

Blocked on:
issue 851777



Sign in to add a comment

Run analysis again

Project Member Reported by ortuno@chromium.org, Jun 4 2018

Issue description

Comment 1 by st...@chromium.org, Jun 4 2018

Owner: lijeffrey@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Unconfirmed)
It seems this analysis (among others) cannot be rerun, what I've noticed is the un-rerunable ones tend to be on tryserver.chromium.* leading me to believe there's a bug in rerunning requests from cq

Comment 3 by st...@chromium.org, Jun 6 2018

Labels: -Pri-2 Pri-1
Any updates? I can't figure out why my tests became flaky and findit would reaaally help here!
Reruns are blocked by  issue 851777  with a fix in review. If deployed we can rerun this analysis tomorrow
Blockedon: 851777

Comment 7 by ortuno@chromium.org, Jun 18 2018

Seems like the blocking issue has been fixed. How would I go about triggering a re-run?
It seems this is one of those low-flakiness cases, after rerunning the analysis it went back a bit and found a "stable" (98%+ passing) point (which is incorrect, as we recently flipped a switch to use 99.99999+% passing to count as "stable"), then ran into trouble trying to bisect the range between when it went from 98% to 96% passing which is likely the incorrect regression range.

ortuno@ how would you like to proceed? We can run the analysis again and force it to go back further by ensuring it's using the 99.99% figure, or is the conclusion that this is a low-flakiness case sufficient for your needs?
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Thanks for running the analysis again! I believe that specific flaky test was due to some issues with mac.

My ping a couple of days ago was because I was sheriff and there were some analysis for flaky tests that I wanted to rerun.

Looking forward for the retry feature to be exposed!

Sign in to add a comment