New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 848259 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: WontFix
Owner:
futhark@chromium.org
Closed: Jun 2018
Cc:
pnangunoori@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux , Mac
Pri: 1
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

Stack-overflow in blink::LayoutTreeBuilderTraversal::Parent

Project Member Reported by ClusterFuzz, May 31 2018 
Detailed report: https://clusterfuzz.com/testcase?key=4526419900891136

Fuzzer: inferno_layout_test_unmodified
Job Type: mac_asan_chrome
Platform Id: mac

Crash Type: Stack-overflow
Crash Address: 0x7fff57385ee0
Crash State:
  blink::LayoutTreeBuilderTraversal::Parent
  blink::LayoutTreeBuilderTraversal::LayoutParent
  blink::LayoutTreeBuilderTraversal::ParentLayoutObject
  
Sanitizer: address (ASAN)

Reproducer Testcase: https://clusterfuzz.com/download?testcase_id=4526419900891136

Issue filed automatically.

See https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz-tools for more information.

Comment 1 by pnangunoori@chromium.org, Jun 1 2018

Cc: pnangunoori@chromium.org
Components: Blink>Layout>Grid
Labels: M-67 Test-Predator-Wrong
Owner: futhark@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
Predator and CL could not provide any possible suspects.
Using the code search for the file, “flat_tree_traversal.h” assigning to concern owner from GIT blame.

Suspecting Commit#
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/c0c6c25fe6077d60dccd0461fd45e01455feb240

@futhark -- Could you please look into this issue, kindly reassign if it has nothing to do with your changes.
Thank You.

Comment 2 by futhark@chromium.org, Jun 1 2018

Labels: ClusterFuzz-Ignore
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Recursive AttachLayoutTree in deep dom tree.
Project Member

Comment 3 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 3 2018

Labels: OS-Linux
Project Member

Comment 4 by ClusterFuzz, Jun 8 2018

Labels: Needs-Feedback
ClusterFuzz testcase 4526419900891136 is still reproducing on tip-of-tree build (trunk).

If this testcase was not reproducible locally or unworkable, ignore this notification and we will file another bug soon with hopefully a better and workable testcase.

Otherwise, if this is not intended to be fixed (e.g. this is an intentional crash), please add ClusterFuzz-Ignore label to prevent future bug filing with similar crash stacktrace.
►

Sign in to add a comment