Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
0.2% regression in sizes at 560993:560993 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 30 2018
Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because this autoroll is the only CL in range: Roll AFDO from 68.0.3437.0_rc-r2 to 68.0.3438.0_rc-r1 This CL may cause a small binary size increase, roughly proportional to how long it's been since our last AFDO profile roll. For larger increases (around or exceeding 100KB), please file a bug against gbiv@chromium.org. Additional context: https://crbug.com/805539 The AutoRoll server is located here: https://afdo-chromium-roll.skia.org Documentation for the AutoRoller is here: https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+/master/autoroll/README.md If the roll is causing failures, please contact the current sheriff, who should be CC'd on the roll, and stop the roller if necessary. TBR=gbiv@chromium.org Change-Id: Ic7ab0978b450ddf7d102c60fd7c2dc93d54e5d57 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1070002 Commit-Queue: afdo-chromium-autoroll <afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Reviewed-by: afdo-chromium-autoroll <afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#560993}
,
May 30 2018
It looks like the roll to 3437.0_rc-r2 won us 389KB of binary size, then this roll recaptured around 262KB of that win. Given that the 3437-r2 profile was pretty broken all-around (it caused huge regressions on some Android metrics that I'm looking into, and was a pretty decent binary size regression), I don't think there's anything in particular to do about this. I'm actively trying to figure out how to improve the stability of Chrome when we get a new profile drop, but that's a more general effort. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 30 2018