Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1% regression in rasterize_and_record_micro.top_25 at 559421:559460 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1688d766240000
,
Jun 3 2018
📍 Found significant differences after each of 2 commits. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1688d766240000 Stop getting the user-agent string in renderer by yhirano@chromium.org https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/b0465f7f1ab77ae73cf2dd4c0950fee51f7528d4 0.4249 → 0.4306 (+0.00575) Roll AFDO from 68.0.3432.0_rc-r2 to 68.0.3433.0_rc-r1 by afdo-chromium-autoroll@skia-buildbots.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/9263cc55b019c080fc4f0fd62b5152b4aa1066bb 0.4303 → 0.4367 (+0.006375) Assigning to sheriff gbiv@chromium.org because "Roll AFDO from 68.0.3432.0_rc-r2 to 68.0.3433.0_rc-r1" is a roll. Understanding performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions
,
Jun 3 2018
The tick down at '560966 - 561030' appears to have another AFDO roll in it, and it looks like we're roughly stable at pre-regression levels after that point (though given that this is a 2% regression, it's a bit hard to say for sure). I'm trying to address AFDO instability in general at the moment; will look into this as a part of that, but I suspect it's already been 'fixed', so I won't be rushing to stare at it. :) |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 29 2018