Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1525820997:1525832901 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945182907558829696
,
May 30 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-512-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_tools/load_tools_stackoverflow Change : 0.32% | 4434600.66667 -> 4448774.14286 Revision Result N android-chrome@b425a64a09 4434601 +- 79628.3 21 good android-chrome@fc263d8616 4448774 +- 94134.2 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.stackoverflow system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945182907558829696 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 29 2018