Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.7% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1526878632:1526887739 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 29 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945185589371424976
,
May 30 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-webview-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/background_tools/background_tools_gmail Change : 0.00% | 3969024.0 -> 3969024.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@8257df3404 3969024 +- 0.0 21 good android-chrome@ab26e7ad9f 3969024 +- 0.0 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.tools.gmail system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945185589371424976 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 29 2018