Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1526345815:1526357175 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 25 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945556534532513568
,
May 25 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yandex Change : 0.19% | 4035781.71429 -> 4027920.7619 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 4035782 +- 59109.3 21 good android-chrome@dda312c828 4027921 +- 57348.4 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yandex system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945556534532513568 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jul 4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 25 2018