Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.5%-4.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 1526345815:1526357175 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 23 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945704917451699584
,
May 24 2018
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author gab@chromium.org === Hi gab@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Gabriel Charette Commit : c9ba7a990ab0b915bf85cc17f5a9a5474cb92da7 Date : Thu May 10 21:10:59 2018 Subject: [base] Add default arguments for WaitableEvent construction. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/background_social/background_social_facebook Change : 2.64% | 84129556.0 -> 86350100.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 84129556 +- 860737 6 good android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557672 86220905 +- 438967 6 bad <-- android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557673 85400340 +- 472784 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557675 85903977 +- 501416 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557678 86002452 +- 605493 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557684 85967465 +- 482141 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557696 86651839 +- 231778 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557721 86503017 +- 771510 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557770 86826431 +- 437275 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557868 87189268 +- 510650 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@558065 87548009 +- 700741 6 bad android-chrome@dda312c828 86350100 +- 1021755 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.social.facebook system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945704917451699584 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 25 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945544313125360432
,
May 25 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945544306270304416
,
May 27 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 81a3b828c376c285abf615d0573024b44cb46463 bad_revision : 2ecdfaf5439c6e2e4ac60442e8d7df118701b446 If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_media/load_media_google_images Change : 0.94% | 28109949.7143 -> 27845245.7143 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 28109950 +- 282385 21 good android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557770 28185360 +- 313143 14 good android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557819 27974709 +- 291565 14 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557868 27829520 +- 126694 14 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@558065 27839833 +- 97410.1 14 bad android-chrome@dda312c828 27845246 +- 165275 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.google.images system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945544306270304416 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 27 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Please try rerunning the bisect. If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_spychase Change : 2.63% | 101640464.0 -> 104314640.0 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 101640464 +- 306188 6 good android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557678 104104379 +- 507872 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557684 103953168 +- 709592 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557696 103746149 +- 505639 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557721 104218725 +- 345305 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557770 104535995 +- 264695 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557868 104352357 +- 316569 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@558065 104133904 +- 303207 6 bad android-chrome@dda312c828 104314640 +- 935422 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.spychase system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945544313125360432 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 28 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945280038118866176
,
May 28 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945280032567121328
,
May 28 2018
Seriously doubt my CL is at fault and bisect is failing now so... tried relaunching bisect but setting back to Untriaged while it's running.
,
May 28 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_media/load_media_google_images Change : 0.67% | 28074646.0952 -> 27886230.0952 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 28074646 +- 329192 21 good android-chrome@dda312c828 27886230 +- 158458 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.google.images system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945280038118866176 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 28 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Gabriel Charette Commit : c9ba7a990ab0b915bf85cc17f5a9a5474cb92da7 Date : Thu May 10 21:10:59 2018 Subject: [base] Add default arguments for WaitableEvent construction. Bisect Details Configuration: go-phone-1024-perf-bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_games/load_games_spychase Change : 3.86% | 101600016.0 -> 105525861.333 Revision Result N android-chrome@4426288b2b 101600016 +- 327110 6 good android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557672 103658597 +- 231411 6 bad <-- android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557673 104052155 +- 291102 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557675 103862203 +- 465401 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557678 104229819 +- 190485 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557684 104256272 +- 562548 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557696 104202341 +- 629030 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557721 104618427 +- 676148 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557770 104962491 +- 158604 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@557868 104102843 +- 400007 6 bad android-chrome@4426288b2b,chromium@558065 104717072 +- 275613 6 bad android-chrome@dda312c828 105525861 +- 346204 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.spychase system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8945280032567121328 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Aug 2
,
Aug 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 23 2018