New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 841956 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: WontFix
Owner:
█ dbehr@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Jun 2018
Cc:
█ marc...@chromium.org
█ hoegsberg@chromium.org
ihf@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Chrome
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

graphics_GLMark2 Baytrail regressions

Project Member Reported by dbehr@google.com, May 10 2018 
Bunch of GLMark2 tests seem to have regressed on BayTrail and possibly other Intel chipsets.

Revision range https://crosland.corp.google.com/log/10384.0.0..10505.0.0

This is little fishy https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/907848
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, May 10 2018 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=841956

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=36ab26dc00d4782610c5f695543e5f8faef5dba894164db5831dcbced7abd06f


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

cros-expresso

Comment 2 by dbehr@chromium.org, May 10 2018

Cc: -dbehr@google.com marc...@chromium.org hoegsberg@chromium.org ihf@chromium.org

Comment 3 by ihf@chromium.org, May 10 2018

Components: OS>Kernel>Graphics
Labels: Gfx-Guard M-67 OS-Chrome
Summary: graphics_GLMark2 Baytrail regressions (was: GLMark2 Baytrail regressions)

Comment 4 by ihf@chromium.org, Jun 13 2018

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
The expresso performance has improved again. The range is pretty big though.

https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=841956
►

Sign in to add a comment