Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 1525340997:1525376201 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
May 9 2018
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8946994187752352256
,
May 9 2018
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: clankium-low-end-phone-perf-bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/https_www_google_co_uk_hl_en_q_science Change : 0.76% | 23934419.0476 -> 24116349.7143 Revision Result N android-chrome@a8d6449870 23934419 +- 302114 21 good android-chrome@3fea53a776 24116350 +- 308822 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chrome --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https.www.google.co.uk.hl.en.q.science memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8946994187752352256 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 7
This regression has been open for half a year. It's not very actionable and the regression has been in all Chrome user's hands for months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, May 9 2018